November 14, 2010
A New York Times online headline: "Netanyahu Agrees to Push for Freeze in Settlements"
The devil indeed lies in details. Read the details and the readers will find that this is a ploy to provide temporary freeze (the freeze will be for 90 days) in exchange for permanent guarantees. Permanent guarantees from the U.S for temporary freeze, wow. Thank you Mr. Netanyahu for the "concession" and your "generosity". The details get even more interesting as permanent guarantees for a temporary freeze is based on suggestions made by the U.S., a supposedly neutral and objective broker. No wonder the peace talks never get passed the headlines.
Commentary Plus will like for the parties to get serious, stop playing the games, settle, and live in peace.
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Saturday, November 13, 2010
Insurance Industry
Insurance industry, and any other industry that makes profit from human health care business should be ashamed. Human health care must not be the business for profiteering. Health care business is for caring and serving. There are plenty of industries for profiteering. Profiteering on the back of ill and the frail is immoral.
Friday, November 12, 2010
MSNBC'S Olbermann Statement Falacy
MSNBC'S Olbermann upon his reinstatement to MSNBC made a statement regarding the rule which was used to fire him. He said, "it was not a stupid rule...". Mr. Olbermann you missed the point, and I am hoping that what you said about the rule that "it was not a stupid rule" was not a bargained statement between you and your corporate master.
The rule is not only stupid, it is immoral as the rule makes you a sophisticated rich slave of a corporation that does not govern itself with similar rule. In general, corporations do not have to declare their contributions, and they are free to give unlimited amount. On the other hand, You, Mr. Olbermann like other mortal human persons have lesser freedom as a human person than the corporation person. So, in minimalist tradition, I will stop here, as I am hoping that some day you will consider the rule that got you fired is stupid and immoral, and you will advocate that corporations govern themselves with similar stupid and immoral rule should they impose such rules on other.
The rule is not only stupid, it is immoral as the rule makes you a sophisticated rich slave of a corporation that does not govern itself with similar rule. In general, corporations do not have to declare their contributions, and they are free to give unlimited amount. On the other hand, You, Mr. Olbermann like other mortal human persons have lesser freedom as a human person than the corporation person. So, in minimalist tradition, I will stop here, as I am hoping that some day you will consider the rule that got you fired is stupid and immoral, and you will advocate that corporations govern themselves with similar stupid and immoral rule should they impose such rules on other.
Sunday, November 7, 2010
New Reality: Corporation Person vs Human Person
Post Supreme Court citizen united decision, there are two distinct types of persons with legal rights in the United States. Type # 1 is a corporation person with unlimited legal rights. Type # 2 is a human person with limited rights. For example, corporation person has legal right to give anonymously unlimited contributions to any political party without permission from anyone; human person on the other hand has limited legal rights to give a limited prescribed amount, must declare his contributions, and if employed by the corporation person, the human person must seek corporation person's permission.
Bottom line, a corporation person has more rights than a human person. In this scenario, human person has become a second class citizen. Welcome to a sophisticated slavery of the 21st century. We the human persons may not like to hear this, or may have already decided to live in denial and not offend corporation master, nevertheless the new reality is here.
Bottom line, a corporation person has more rights than a human person. In this scenario, human person has become a second class citizen. Welcome to a sophisticated slavery of the 21st century. We the human persons may not like to hear this, or may have already decided to live in denial and not offend corporation master, nevertheless the new reality is here.
Saturday, October 30, 2010
Predatory Landing And Predatory Foreclosing
October 30, 2010
Financial corporations including the big banks survived as they received govt. tax payer bailout relief which was given to banks despite of banks mistakes, and their bad business decisions. Now the same financial institutions have instituted multi track foreclosing strategy against the tax payers. Tax payers guilty of their "mistakes or otherwise" deserve relief as well.
The mortgage lenders including the banks are playing game of mortgage modification, and simultaneously and secretly moving to foreclosed the homeowner's home (some homes may deserve foreclosing but not the one's are trying to modify their mortgage as allowed by law). Many home owners are blindsided, and their credits and lives are destroyed.
Welcome to the 21st century legalized financial corporate globalized criminality. Capitalism is being destroyed step by step not by communism, socialism, right or left but by the corporate trickery and greed.
Financial corporations including the big banks survived as they received govt. tax payer bailout relief which was given to banks despite of banks mistakes, and their bad business decisions. Now the same financial institutions have instituted multi track foreclosing strategy against the tax payers. Tax payers guilty of their "mistakes or otherwise" deserve relief as well.
The mortgage lenders including the banks are playing game of mortgage modification, and simultaneously and secretly moving to foreclosed the homeowner's home (some homes may deserve foreclosing but not the one's are trying to modify their mortgage as allowed by law). Many home owners are blindsided, and their credits and lives are destroyed.
Welcome to the 21st century legalized financial corporate globalized criminality. Capitalism is being destroyed step by step not by communism, socialism, right or left but by the corporate trickery and greed.
Thursday, September 23, 2010
A Minimalist Commentary Plus Question To: Warren Buffett's Pronouncement
September 23, 2010 Reuters: Top News Headline:
"Warren Buffett: "We are still in a recession".
Commentary Plus Question:
Mr. Buffett what do you mean by "We"?. This year according to Fortune 500 news you and 399 others like you in America made billions with a total net worth of 1.4 trillion. How could that be a recession for you, sir?.
"Warren Buffett: "We are still in a recession".
Commentary Plus Question:
Mr. Buffett what do you mean by "We"?. This year according to Fortune 500 news you and 399 others like you in America made billions with a total net worth of 1.4 trillion. How could that be a recession for you, sir?.
Sunday, June 6, 2010
A Reflection on Michael Chabon's Op-Ed "Chosen, but Not Special"
"Chosen, but Not Special" an Op-Ed by Michael Chabon published in NYT: June 4, 2010.
The Op-Ed is a critical, analytical as well as a reflective piece of writing. Mr. Chabon's efforts to be fair minded are refreshing. However, there is a presumption in the title of Michael Chabon's Op-Ed which is troubling. The presumption is that the group addressed in the Op-Ed may not be the "Special" however it is the "Chosen" nevertheless. There lies the fragments of mystery that is not so mysterious with what the human race has been beleaguered by multiple groups claiming in their own ways and in their own "god" given rights as the "chosen" one's and expressing their views implicitly and explicitly in different ways yet inherently meaning the same that they are the chosen one and making efforts to establish the dominance in one form or the other. The concepts of being the so called "Chosen" ones are described, implied, and written by various groups in different words formulated and institutionalized over times in various forms including in the scriptures, the holy books, and various other forms of writings. In general, all groups on this planet earth consider themselves as the chosen one not the other.
In reality, various groups consider themselves to be the "Chosen" one, however they may express the concept differently, twisting and meandering the words but meaning the same. Once the presumption of chosen one is established then the next presumption for the group becomes easier to make, and that is that their group must be the right one since it is the chosen one (a convoluted misguided thinking nevertheless it is consistent with the linear logical and inferential conclusions made in every day life).
Once the group begins to believe that they are the chosen one, then an another a little more sinister presumption takes hold and has taken hold during the course of human history that is that the other groups couldn't be the chosen one (chosen one being a singularity rather than a plurality concept). And, therefore each group has been bestowing upon itself all the "god" given power and the rights, and taking away whenever possible as much power and the rights from the other groups in efforts to be the chosen one. The human groups are locked into a perpetual head bashing with each other, and ironically no one has yet won to be the chosen one.
So, what is the way out of this quagmire? The solution may not be difficult (putting the solution in practice is another matter). The solution is simple: It is time to accept that it is not any particular group that is the chosen one rather it is the human race at large in of itself is the chosen one (if we have to hang on to the word "Chosen" as the umbilical cord until freed from and weaned out of it). Any thing less then that that the human race is the chosen one as a whole rather than any particular group will leave the simmering cancerous social cancer of the so called the chosen one's to collide with the so called the other chosen one's as the groups have been colliding with each other over and over during the course of human existence known to our consciousness. It is a sick truism.
So, let there be a different truism to emerge in our time, if it is at all possible, that we all are the chosen one, and let us make efforts to be the worthy of being good, and a fun human race, and stop this silly game of chosen one explicit, implied, or otherwise that belongs to a group.
The Op-Ed is a critical, analytical as well as a reflective piece of writing. Mr. Chabon's efforts to be fair minded are refreshing. However, there is a presumption in the title of Michael Chabon's Op-Ed which is troubling. The presumption is that the group addressed in the Op-Ed may not be the "Special" however it is the "Chosen" nevertheless. There lies the fragments of mystery that is not so mysterious with what the human race has been beleaguered by multiple groups claiming in their own ways and in their own "god" given rights as the "chosen" one's and expressing their views implicitly and explicitly in different ways yet inherently meaning the same that they are the chosen one and making efforts to establish the dominance in one form or the other. The concepts of being the so called "Chosen" ones are described, implied, and written by various groups in different words formulated and institutionalized over times in various forms including in the scriptures, the holy books, and various other forms of writings. In general, all groups on this planet earth consider themselves as the chosen one not the other.
In reality, various groups consider themselves to be the "Chosen" one, however they may express the concept differently, twisting and meandering the words but meaning the same. Once the presumption of chosen one is established then the next presumption for the group becomes easier to make, and that is that their group must be the right one since it is the chosen one (a convoluted misguided thinking nevertheless it is consistent with the linear logical and inferential conclusions made in every day life).
Once the group begins to believe that they are the chosen one, then an another a little more sinister presumption takes hold and has taken hold during the course of human history that is that the other groups couldn't be the chosen one (chosen one being a singularity rather than a plurality concept). And, therefore each group has been bestowing upon itself all the "god" given power and the rights, and taking away whenever possible as much power and the rights from the other groups in efforts to be the chosen one. The human groups are locked into a perpetual head bashing with each other, and ironically no one has yet won to be the chosen one.
So, what is the way out of this quagmire? The solution may not be difficult (putting the solution in practice is another matter). The solution is simple: It is time to accept that it is not any particular group that is the chosen one rather it is the human race at large in of itself is the chosen one (if we have to hang on to the word "Chosen" as the umbilical cord until freed from and weaned out of it). Any thing less then that that the human race is the chosen one as a whole rather than any particular group will leave the simmering cancerous social cancer of the so called the chosen one's to collide with the so called the other chosen one's as the groups have been colliding with each other over and over during the course of human existence known to our consciousness. It is a sick truism.
So, let there be a different truism to emerge in our time, if it is at all possible, that we all are the chosen one, and let us make efforts to be the worthy of being good, and a fun human race, and stop this silly game of chosen one explicit, implied, or otherwise that belongs to a group.
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Raise awareness for global education with Buddhasoren apparel!
Make a statement! Check out Buddhasoren's new product line at Zazzle.com. Featuring thought-provoking message-wear, this apparel is perfect for philosophers, students, activists or anyone who wants to make the world a better place. All proceeds benefit International Academic Institude, advocating global free access to education.
http://www.zazzle.com/sanity_is_an_abnormality_in_an_insane_world_tshirt-235931638914873525
http://www.zazzle.com/sanity_is_an_abnormality_in_an_insane_world_tshirt-235931638914873525
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Tug of War Between Spendings on Health And Education, And Spendings on Defense And War Funds
There is a perpetual tug of war between the national spendings in programs such as human growth and development including health and eduaction, and the national spendings in programs such as defense including war funds . The spendings in defense and the war funds always wins.
Does this scenario tells something about us as a human specie?
A Time To Ponder......
Does this scenario tells something about us as a human specie?
A Time To Ponder......
Thursday, January 21, 2010
A shift in American Democracy: The Supreme Court Has Spoken
While the people, and the journalists were preoccupied with John Edward's sexual indiscretions, lies, and deceits, and the media payoff to the comedian Conan, the democracy in America was changing if it has not already changed.
The supreme court ruled (or we say, in it's living wisdom confirmed the right of speech to non-livings, the corporations) that corporations, the entities though non-living and not mentioned in the First Amendment, are guaranteed freedom of speech by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, and thereof, the corporations deserve the freedom of expression. There-by, the court proclaimed, corporations can contribute to effect the elections (buy the election, a better expression) as much as corporations hearts desire, even if they have no living hearts. This is done under the protection of the ruling of the United States Supreme Court, the Supreme jurisprudence entity.
So, welcome to a democracy of the corporations, for the corporations, and by the corporations, and forget the people. The people can not compete with the corporations in a trickle down and recessed economy.
Now we have a democracy on this planet that belongs to entities, the money entities, the corporations not the people.
The supreme court ruled (or we say, in it's living wisdom confirmed the right of speech to non-livings, the corporations) that corporations, the entities though non-living and not mentioned in the First Amendment, are guaranteed freedom of speech by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, and thereof, the corporations deserve the freedom of expression. There-by, the court proclaimed, corporations can contribute to effect the elections (buy the election, a better expression) as much as corporations hearts desire, even if they have no living hearts. This is done under the protection of the ruling of the United States Supreme Court, the Supreme jurisprudence entity.
So, welcome to a democracy of the corporations, for the corporations, and by the corporations, and forget the people. The people can not compete with the corporations in a trickle down and recessed economy.
Now we have a democracy on this planet that belongs to entities, the money entities, the corporations not the people.
Saturday, January 9, 2010
AIG (American Insurance Group) Mystery Simplified
It all started with Regan trickle economy, deregulation, and Greenspan "free market" adventure. The so called entrepreneurs were encouraged to take risk free risk by doing any thing (foolish or other wise) and make money. And money they made. It was all insured by insurance industry in particular, you guessed it right, by AIG. When the "free market" system the so called crashed, the republican administration bailed out the AIG, and the AIG bailed out the "free market" entrepreneurs. The end of story.
Now, the free marketeers like Goldman Sachs are rich from the AIG bail out money, and out they go to play the so called "free market" game. Any question.
Now, the free marketeers like Goldman Sachs are rich from the AIG bail out money, and out they go to play the so called "free market" game. Any question.
Monday, December 21, 2009
Year 2009: The State of The Inhabitants of Planet Earth
Capital mantra has risen, and
the rest are fizzled
in media commercial riddle.
Commentary plus wishes a happy holiday to all it's viewers.
Thursday, November 12, 2009
So, What is The News
New York Times Top Story News "American Adviser to Kurds Stands to Reap Oil Profits" published on November 12, 2009. The write up states that Peter W. Galbraith "could earn millions"............
Commentary Plus, in it's minimalist tradition, would like to ask the New York Times a simple question: So what's the news?
Commentary Plus, in it's minimalist tradition, would like to ask the New York Times a simple question: So what's the news?
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
CNN Post Bias
October 21, 2009
"Americans more familier with Latinos, Poll finds" CNN webpost
Commentary Plus question of the day: Are Latinos not American? The poll demonstrate the bias so does the CNN title.
"Americans more familier with Latinos, Poll finds" CNN webpost
Commentary Plus question of the day: Are Latinos not American? The poll demonstrate the bias so does the CNN title.
Monday, September 7, 2009
Obama's Speech To Students
By publishing the speech, and keeping the speech non-partition Obama is making the conservatives wolf cry look foolish and silly, and most importantly Obama is keeping himself politically strong and viable.
A smart and hawkish move Mr. President.
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Obamas Visit Grand Canyon
There was a write up about first lady visiting Grand Canyon in shorts. According to the write up some anonymous grumps did not like the first lady in short. The picture was great. In the picture our first lady and the first daughter looked beautiful and naturally glamorous.
Commentary plus is pleased to see America's first family just like rest of Americans who knows how to relax, and have fun.
Commentary plus wishes first family the best of summer, and lots of fun in shorts.
Friday, July 24, 2009
Ms. Maria Haberfeld's Biased and Incomplete Analysis Rush of Judgement on Police
Commentary: Obama's rush to judgment on police by Maria Haberfeld published at CNNPOLITICS.COM July 24, 2009.
Ms. Haberfeld's commentary and analysis left out several points including police officer's no response to question to identify himself and his badge #. According to news information Prof. Gates had asked three times, and police officer ignored the question not once but three times. Commentary Plus is mindful of dangers police officers face when they are called upon to check out possible burglary. However, what is a or the professional response by the officer once the officer knew that the person in the house was a rightful occupant, and there was no burglary. Wouldn't have been a professional response by the officer to say to the rightful house occupant that he was responding to a call for burglary, and now since there is no burglary sorry for any inconvenience, and left?
Commentary Plus would like to hear from Ms. Haberfeld regarding police officer's obligations towards the rightful occupant of a house who was the victim of a false alarm. Do police officers have any civility obligation in their book in such false alarm cases? Do police officer have any obligation to identify themselves and their badge # once asked? How many times police officer can ignore a private citizen question while police officer is in private citizen's house based on a false alarm?
Maria, please respond.
comments are welcomed and appreciated.
Ms. Haberfeld's commentary and analysis left out several points including police officer's no response to question to identify himself and his badge #. According to news information Prof. Gates had asked three times, and police officer ignored the question not once but three times. Commentary Plus is mindful of dangers police officers face when they are called upon to check out possible burglary. However, what is a or the professional response by the officer once the officer knew that the person in the house was a rightful occupant, and there was no burglary. Wouldn't have been a professional response by the officer to say to the rightful house occupant that he was responding to a call for burglary, and now since there is no burglary sorry for any inconvenience, and left?
Commentary Plus would like to hear from Ms. Haberfeld regarding police officer's obligations towards the rightful occupant of a house who was the victim of a false alarm. Do police officers have any civility obligation in their book in such false alarm cases? Do police officer have any obligation to identify themselves and their badge # once asked? How many times police officer can ignore a private citizen question while police officer is in private citizen's house based on a false alarm?
Maria, please respond.
comments are welcomed and appreciated.
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
The Atom Bomb
An article "A Flash of Memory" written by Issey Miyake that was published this morning (July 14,2009) in NYT Op-Ed is inspirational, and full of hope.
Commentary Plus hopes that the humanity that had embraced the ultimate cruelty once might turn and embrace the ultimate peace. Let us wish and hope that this is the calling of our time.
Let Mr. Miyake's life story and his aspiration become a guide post to aspire to rid the planet earth from nuclear weapons, and may President Obama show courage and accept Mr. Miyake's invitation to walk the peace bridge in Hiroshima. President Obama has an opportunity to set a new political ground rule to be followed by everyone to make the planet earth a nuclear weapon free planet.
Commentary plus encourages readers to comment, and express their point of views.
Commentary Plus hopes that the humanity that had embraced the ultimate cruelty once might turn and embrace the ultimate peace. Let us wish and hope that this is the calling of our time.
Let Mr. Miyake's life story and his aspiration become a guide post to aspire to rid the planet earth from nuclear weapons, and may President Obama show courage and accept Mr. Miyake's invitation to walk the peace bridge in Hiroshima. President Obama has an opportunity to set a new political ground rule to be followed by everyone to make the planet earth a nuclear weapon free planet.
Commentary plus encourages readers to comment, and express their point of views.
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Charity And Truth
July 7, 2009 Washington Post on line article titled "Pope Eyes New Financial Order" states "Pope Benedict xvi writes that economic systems need to be guided by charity and truth".
Commentary Plus has a question:
Guided by whose charity and truth?
Myopic visions and controlling agendas of charity and truth have caused more distrust and misery than humanity deserves. The financial orders of religion, state, and business world have some explaining to do. Who is going to take the lead is the begging question? Is Pope Benedict xvi ready to do some explaining? Pontificating and political maneuvering of charity and truth will not and can not be charitable nor truthful.
Commentary Plus has a question:
Guided by whose charity and truth?
Myopic visions and controlling agendas of charity and truth have caused more distrust and misery than humanity deserves. The financial orders of religion, state, and business world have some explaining to do. Who is going to take the lead is the begging question? Is Pope Benedict xvi ready to do some explaining? Pontificating and political maneuvering of charity and truth will not and can not be charitable nor truthful.
Friday, July 3, 2009
Moral Imperatives
scripted orders of scrupulous scripted social mind governing the human life can never be moral
social orders scripted in economic orders benefiting select few and dealing the blow to the rest so select few can benefit more can never be moral
bail out the big let the small fail rather than letting the small survive to become big can never be moral
interest bearing loans for students to get education to serve social and economic orders to become tax payers is a form of double taxation that can never be moral
social order that creates jurists to protect the loans and the loan sharks not the future tax payers should the conditions change can never be moral
demand for personal responsibility to serve social order without demands for social responsibility to serve the person can never be moral
social orders scripted in economic orders benefiting select few and dealing the blow to the rest so select few can benefit more can never be moral
bail out the big let the small fail rather than letting the small survive to become big can never be moral
interest bearing loans for students to get education to serve social and economic orders to become tax payers is a form of double taxation that can never be moral
social order that creates jurists to protect the loans and the loan sharks not the future tax payers should the conditions change can never be moral
demand for personal responsibility to serve social order without demands for social responsibility to serve the person can never be moral
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
